Kazakhstan is – like many different nations with a post-Soviet legacy – battling corrosive and widespread corruption. The Council of Europe’s Group of States in opposition to Corruption (GRECO) has referred to as the extent of corruption in Kazakhstan “critical” and estimates that it’s pervasive in quite a few sectors within the nation, together with the general public sector and public establishments. The judiciary in Kazakhstan can also be affected by this tendency, to the detriment of rule of legislation within the nation.
A sample of instances of judicial corruption could be noticed in Kazakhstan. As an example, in 2020, a decide in a felony listening to of bribery in opposition to a civil servant who had illegally leased a plot of land acquired a bribe of $26,000 in return for acquitting the civil servant. The corruption got here to mild when the appellate court docket overturned the acquittal. The decide was caught red-handed returning the bribe to the civil servant.
Transparency Worldwide publishes annual scores measuring corruption notion for nearly all nations on the planet. Kazakhstan ranks 93rd out of 180; in comparison with Kyrgyzstan (141), Tajikistan (162), Turkmenistan (170), and Uzbekistan (121), it performs finest within the Central Asian area. Globally, Kazakhstan is flanked by nations like India (tied with India at 93), Belarus (98), and Albania (98).
The Norwegian U4 Anti-Corruption Useful resource Centre has analyzed corruption developments in Kazakhstan. Such developments embody grand corruption, the place folks in energy have used their place to extract public funds, and likewise nepotism, the place folks use their place to provide preferential therapy to members of their household, clan, tribe or community. A well-known instance of each sorts of corruption was how former President Nursultan Nazarbayev and his household managed belongings and gained huge wealth by corruption schemes. However corruption within the public sector can also be widespread – together with within the judiciary.
Since 2021, 30 judges have been held accountable for corruption, leading to 15 jail sentences, which notably is greater than within the earlier eight years mixed. One instance is the previous chairman of the Kostanay District Court docket, who final yr was sentenced to 9 years’ imprisonment for receiving a bribe of virtually $40,000 in 2022. Because the finish of 2023, three judges in Almaty area and Konaev metropolis have additionally been accused of corruption. Extra worrying, in Talgar, a decide acquired a bribe in alternate for altering the obligatory medical measures for an individual who had abused a toddler.
This downside is just not new in Kazakhstan, though it’s maybe extra seen as extra judges are being convicted than earlier than. In 2012, two judges of Kazakhstan’s Supreme Court docket have been sentenced to prolonged jail phrases for accepting a bribe of $70,000 from a non-public firm for “favorable consideration of its declare.”
Olga Didenko, a neighborhood professional in anti-corruption efforts, highlighted that a lot of the corruption within the judiciary goes underneath the radar, though the bribes are vital, and the issue appears all-encompassing all through the sector:
Corruption within the judicial system stays an issue and severely undermines efforts to strengthen the independence of the judiciary. We must always keep in mind that the variety of instances recognized and judges convicted for corruption is far decrease than, for instance, convicted workers of state our bodies of legislation enforcement businesses. Nevertheless, the bribes are bigger, as is the harm to society in such instances of corruption within the judicial system. In 2023, three judges have been convicted of accepting bribes for making favorable choices… However these are solely the recognized instances that reached court docket. In response to NGOs, corruption within the judicial system stays at a excessive stage.
The Anti-Corruption Company is the physique answerable for investigating corruption in Kazakhstan. Though the company is finishing up a lot work to deal with the urgent points, its work can’t succeed with out authorized reform. The 2 easiest methods to beat corruption within the judiciary are to improve the salaries of judges, whereas additionally eradicating advantages from their employment circumstances. The independence of judges is carefully associated to their earnings, and the scale of their salaries must be public and controlled by legislation. Sadly, in Kazakhstan, judges’ salaries will not be public.
In response to the Kyiv Suggestions, a set of tips and suggestions advising on tips on how to uphold independence of the judiciary in Japanese Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia, it’s advisable to take away advantages (similar to bonuses and different privileges) for judges and exchange these with larger salaries that make sure the judges a way of life that displays the extent of duty of their occupation, with a view to struggle the danger of corruption within the sector.
If these urgent points will not be handled, rule of legislation in Kazakhstan will proceed to be underneath risk, and the state of affairs is unlikely to enhance.