Economics programs at college in Australia have been underneath risk for a number of a long time now and lots of specialist levels have been deserted by universities as pupil enrolments declined. When the federal authorities merged the vocational greater training establishments (Schools of Superior Schooling) with the schools within the late Eighties, conventional economics colleges had been swamped with half-baked ‘enterprise’ programs in administration, HRM, advertising and marketing and no matter which then attracted the aspiring ‘entrepreneurs’ who had been informed by the advertising and marketing literature that they might be fast-tracking into administration careers within the company sector. The fact was that these applications didn’t equip the scholars to do very a lot in any respect (maybe erect advertising and marketing shows in supermarkets!) however the affect on economics applications was devastating. The newest Reserve Financial institution of Australia (RBA) Bulletin revealed on January 30, 2025 contained an article which bears on this subject – The place Have All of the Economics College students Gone?. I talk about a number of the implications of the decline in pupil numbers in economics and the shortage of variety that present applications have for societal well-being.
A brief historical past
In 1994, I used to be elected by my colleagues to be the subsequent Head of Division of Economics on the College of Newcastle.
It was nonetheless a time when ‘democracy’ dominated in Australian college departments and I used to be really the final elected head at that college.
The tides of neoliberalism and corporatisation had been already starting and through my time period, consultants really useful that the college stop elections for all of the senior positions (HOD, Deans, President of Senate, and so on) and as an alternative transfer to appointments solely.
Clearly, this lowered the voice that we had because the appointments had been crafted to take care of management of the brand new KPI-driven agenda.
I do not forget that after my first time period (4 years), I used to be invited to proceed for a second time period by the Vice Chancellor.
On the assembly, he stated ‘welcome, you might be one in every of us now’!
I requested him who ‘us’ had been and he replied a part of line administration.
I demurred and informed him that he was unsuitable and that I used to be simply the consultant of the collective (my colleagues) to administration and that he mustn’t assume in any other case.
I recall him being a bit stunned (-:
However these days had been the start of an extended decline for economics training within the college system.
As much as that point (1994), the federal authorities had allotted funding to States to fund capital and recurrent expenditure in universities on a triennial foundation.
The general public universities in Australia are legislative creations of the states however it’s the federal authorities cash that stored them afloat.
The triennial funding system gave universities some safety and continuity and departments had been in a position to make pitches on the idea of the so-called ‘institution’ (which carried a variety of appointments).
The hyperlink between pupil load and the institution was hazy and the latter was pushed extra by the political abilities of the college admin after which inside every establishments by the abilities of the college bosses (Deans and HODs).
After I turned HOD, the Economics Division was the biggest (in staffing) within the college and the employees had loved a whole lot of safety for some years.
Issues modified dramatically round that point although.
Within the late Eighties and early Nineteen Nineties, the federal authorities created a unified tertiary system – merging the schools, institutes of know-how and schools of superior training.
It was brutal shift and brought on huge disruption to the interior buildings of the schools.
In a single day, we had college lecturers with PhDs who had constructed analysis careers pressured to work with CAE employees who had been actually college academics – no superior levels, no analysis background and used to lengthy holidays over Summer time (which is the time the lively researchers write up their aggressive analysis grant functions).
The mergers created ‘enterprise colleges’ and downgraded the place of economics – which was seen as a service course for these new ‘enterprise levels’, relatively than the core educational self-discipline of the normal colleges.
I recall getting memos from senior managers demanding to know why the primary 12 months failure charges, which had been at all times round 30 per cent, weren’t just like the close to 100% go charges in administration.
The emphasis was on why we had been dangerous relatively than why the 100 per cent go charges had been dangerous and prevented the truth that college students in administration got straightforward exams which just about anybody might go with little understanding of something.
However issues turned a lot worse quickly after.
The federal authorities, as a part of its unified tertiary system, deserted the triennial funding association and as an alternative launched the ‘relative funding’ mannequin, which supplied a single working grant to establishments primarily based on pupil load.
Additional funding was supplied – so-called ‘analysis quantum – on the idea of analysis output.
Inside establishments, the relative funding mannequin supplied $s to disciplines primarily based on enrolments which meant that the previous idea of an institution profile was deserted and the chilly winds of ‘load’ turned the supply of funds and staffing.
There have been many distortions in educating and analysis that adopted – short-termism, load relatively than high quality, and so on – which I gained’t go into right here in any element.
However the rush was then on to pack the rafters with college students.
Additionally the ‘export market’ opened up and abroad college students had been seen as the way in which to ease funding shortfalls.
Additional high quality distortions accompanied that ‘gold rush’ which persist to now.
However in my first assembly with the Dean after taking up the HOD position I used to be informed that the brand new relative funding mannequin meant our Division price range needed to lose about $A2 million in what was solely a $4.5 million complete annual allocation.
The rationale – pupil load had diminished because the ‘enterprise levels’ entered the fray and economics was not seen as a fascinating course of research.
In my time as HOD, the Division shrunk from round 32 full-time employees to round 14 – roughly (I’ve no formal information to be precise) via numerous attrition applications pursued by the Dean.
After my second time period, the brand new managers of the School pressured a closure of the Division altogether and the abandonment of the Economics diploma.
At the moment, I negotiated with the Vice Chancellor to go away the School construction and to shift my analysis group – Centre of Full Employment and Fairness – as a stand-alone entity inside the College construction and solely report back to the DVC Analysis.
I used to be ready to try this as a result of I used to be attracting a big quantity of exterior analysis funding which meant I might fund my group with out college help.
It was very liberating however the plight of the economists inside the college simply deteriorated additional as a result of the vast majority of the analysis earnings generated by ‘economists’ went with me to CofFEE.
Anyway, the purpose of all that’s that the decline in pupil curiosity in economics had had big impacts throughout Australian universities.
RBA analysis
The RBA article (cited within the Introduction) notes that:
The dimensions and variety of the economics pupil inhabitants has declined sharply because the early Nineteen Nineties, elevating considerations about financial literacy in society and the long-term well being of the economics self-discipline.
The RBA notes that economics was “one of the crucial in style topics in highschool three a long time in the past”.
However that has modified dramatically because the Nineteen Nineties.
UAC is the Universities Admissions Centre and the RBA analysis examines knowledge for simply NSW and the ACT.
Nevertheless, the developments they detect are nationwide.
The next graph (Graph 1 within the RBA report) exhibits that “Between 1999 and 2023, solely round 10 per cent of all 12 months 12 college students included an economics course amongst their preferences to UAC, with simply 1 per cent of all college students really enrolling in a single”.
The decline since has not simply been in total numbers.
The RBA additionally finds that:
… there’s a rising uniformity amongst economics college students, and this additionally extends to those that change into economists or apply economics of their careers
What do they imply?
Feminine college students who studied 12 months 12 economics had been much less more likely to embody an economics course of their preferences than their male counterparts over the 1999–2023 interval. As an alternative, feminine highschool economics college students had been extra more likely to present curiosity in arts and social science, drugs and well being, and legislation than their male friends.
Curiously, of the females who initially expressing a choice with the UAC course of for economics however “who in the end selected to not enrol in an economics course had, on common, greater ATARs than males who enrolled in economics”.
The ATAR is the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank – a rating utilized by the admission centres to allocate college students throughout college programs.
Meaning the academically brighter feminine college students didn’t go into the economics applications, that are dominated by decrease scoring males.
The opposite variety angle is the scholars’ socio-economic background.
The RBA finds that:
… college students who’re concerned about economics at college are inclined to belong to advantaged socio-economic teams, together with college students from non-government colleges …
So the economics college students are from the wealthy households and have attended the very costly non-public secondary colleges – which implies they’ll have amassed sure values about their ‘place’ in society.
I mentioned parts of that tendency in these weblog posts amongst others:
1. The conflicting position performed by training in social mobility and sophistication reinforcement (August 9, 2023).
2. The proof from the sociologists towards financial considering is compelling (November 12, 2019).
3. The brainwashing of economics graduate college students (February 12, 2019).
4. Economics curriculum is required to work towards selfishness and for altruism (September 19, 2018).
5. Schooling – a car for sophistication division (November 23, 2010).
A big physique of analysis in social sciences (around the globe) has demonstrated that commonplace economics applications at our universities breed folks with sociopathological tendencies who elevate greed above empathy.
There may be clearly some self-selection bias as a result of the research have by no means actually remoted the impacts of the educating applications from the tendencies of the scholars going into the applications.
One 205 research that was revealed within the journal Human Relations – Private Worth Priorities of Economists – discovered that:
1. Economics college students exhibited much less altruism and extra self-interest of their “first week of their freshman 12 months”.
2. That’s, “variations between college students of economics and college students from different disciplines had been already obvious earlier than college students had been uncovered to coaching in economics”.
3. After one 12 months of research these variations had been maintained and secure.
4. By the ultimate 12 months of research, the emphasis on “achievement, energy, hedonism” had been sustained and financial college students valuation of “benevolence”, which we would consider as being empathy in the direction of others, had declined considerably.
Of their 1993 article – Does Learning Economics Inhibit Cooperation? – economist Robert Frank and psychologists Thomas Gilovich and Dennis Regan summarised the extant literature and performed a sequence of their very own experiments to discover whether or not there are important variations between “economists and noneconomists” in relation to whether or not they exhibit sociopathological tendencies.
They conclude that:
1. “that economists are extra possible than others to free-ride”.
2. “economics coaching might inhibit cooperation …”
3. And, apparently, that “the last word victims of noncooperative conduct often is the very individuals who apply it”.
4. And college students in economics courses usually tend to lie when confronted with experiments about generosity – that’s, claiming to be extra beneficiant than they had been.
Additional, an LSE Centre for Financial Efficiency Dialogue Paper (No. 1938, July 2023) – Are the upwardly cellular extra left-wing? – discovered that:
1. “that greater personal standing and higher-status dad and mom independently produce Conservative voters.”
2. Increased personal standing results in “opposition to redistribution”.
3. “people with essentially the most Proper-wing attitudes (and votes) are then these with excessive social standing whose dad and mom had been additionally of excessive social standing.”
The issue then is that not solely are the variety of economists rising from universities declining however there’s additionally a rising focus amongst males from privileged backgrounds which can be liable to exhibit the kinds of tendencies famous above.
Take into consideration that within the context of designing progressive authorities coverage.
It isn’t a lovely future.
I famous above that the decline was, partly, pushed by the introduction of ‘enterprise’ into the normal economics colleges.
I didn’t wish to give the impression, nonetheless, that this was the complete story.
A not insignificant a part of the decline may be traced to the way in which we taught economics within the Seventies and Eighties, which create sterile studying environments for college students.
After I was an economics pupil, macroeconomics, for instance, was taught from a vital perspective.
The textbooks we used contrasted the vary of views of the varied colleges of thought and left it to the scholars to work out what they thought in regards to the numerous conflicts that arose.
It was a extra normal training which emphasised studying and occupied with the classical literature within the topic.
We had been ‘effectively learn’ within the parlance and had been required to review historical past, totally different financial methods (comparative methods), philosophy of science, logic, methodology, and extra.
The subject material was additionally built-in with information from the opposite social sciences – which meant that we had been uncovered to literature in sociology and psychology for instance.
That tempered the way in which we thought of coverage and society.
Within the Eighties that strategy modified relatively dramatically.
The brand new means of educating out of the US created textbooks that supplied college students with ‘the one mannequin’ and little vital evaluation.
Universities began dropping the historical past of thought programs and the opposite approaches that had enriched the earlier era of scholars.
So there was little debate permitted – that is the mannequin – study it and that was it.
That mannequin – the New Keynesian strategy – defied actuality and has spawned the horrible insurance policies that I rail towards repeatedly in my very own work.
The depiction of the capability of currency-issuing governments as simply giant households with comparable monetary constraints turned central to the pedagogy and is, in fact, plain unsuitable.
Bear in mind the August 2008 article by Olivier Blanchard – The State of Macro – the place he famous that mainstream economics on the graduate degree has advanced to change into an train in following:
… strict, haiku-like, guidelines … [the economics papers] … look similar to one another in construction, and really totally different from the way in which they did thirty years in the past …
Graduate college students are educated to comply with these ‘haiku-like’ guidelines, that govern an economics paper’s likelihood of publication success.
So if an article submission doesn’t conform to this haiku-like construction it has a considerably diminished likelihood of publication.
So we get a formulaic strategy to publications in macroeconomics that goes one thing like this:
- Assert with out basis – so-called micro-foundations – rationality, maximisation, RATEX.
- Can not cope with actual world folks so cope with one infinitely-lived agent!
- Assert environment friendly, aggressive markets as optimality benchmark.
- Write some trivial mathematical equations and clear up.
- Coverage shock ‘answer’ to ‘show’, for instance, that fiscal coverage ineffective (Ricardian equivalence) and austerity is nice. Maybe enable some short-run stimulus impact.
- Get some knowledge – realise poor match – add some advert hoc lags (worth stickiness and so on) to enhance ‘match’ however find yourself with equivalent long-term outcomes.
- Preserve pretense that micro-foundations are intact – in spite of everything it’s the solely declare to mental authority.
- Publish articles that reinforce beginning assumptions.
- Information quotient – ZERO – GIGO.
This routinisation creates publication bias and coverage recommendation that has little bearing on actuality.
And it’s boring, which is why much less college students wish to pursue these applications.
And those that do are susceptible to the tendencies I mentioned above.
Educating fictions isn’t going to be enticing to college students who wish to be uncovered to vital views that relate to the actual world.
Economists are guilty for the decline in pupil numbers as a result of they’ve engaged in such restrictive Groupthink.
Conclusion
Economics training as it’s practised in our studying establishments is basically propaganda.
College students see via that and eschew it.
And those that don’t change into the coverage makers and the world deteriorates additional.
That’s sufficient for as we speak!
(c) Copyright 2025 William Mitchell. All Rights Reserved.