
The housing market has turn into a nightmare. Costs have skyrocketed. Hire is swallowing paychecks. Homeownership feels much less like an achievable milestone and extra like a pipe dream, particularly for Millennials and Gen Z. Naturally, individuals are on the lookout for somebody responsible. And as a rule, that blame is aimed squarely on the Child Boomer era.
The argument? Boomers purchased homes once they have been low-cost, benefited from many years of property appreciation, and at the moment are hoarding properties, driving up costs, and voting towards insurance policies that might make housing extra accessible.
However is that the entire story? Or is it simply the most recent instance of generational finger-pointing in a system that’s failed everybody, simply unequally? We’re breaking down what’s really fueling the disaster, and whether or not older generations actually deserve the warmth they’re getting.
The Case In opposition to Boomers
It’s straightforward to take a look at the numbers and really feel a surge of resentment. Many Boomers purchased properties within the ’70s and ’80s when the median house worth was a fraction of what it’s right this moment. Incomes weren’t essentially increased, however properties have been extra inexpensive relative to wages. That’s not the case.
At the moment, the price of a house in lots of cities is totally disconnected from what the typical particular person earns. Younger patrons are informed to “simply save extra,” as if avocado toast is what’s retaining them out of the market, not stagnant wages and housing shortages.
Many Boomers additionally profit from insurance policies that shield their monetary positions, like low property taxes, favorable mortgage charges locked in many years in the past, and resistance to zoning reforms that might permit for extra housing. It’s not arduous to see why youthful generations really feel shut out, particularly when older voters usually oppose new developments that might ease the strain.
What Boomers Inherited And What They Didn’t
Nonetheless, it’s value taking a step again. Boomers didn’t create each aspect of the disaster. They inherited a post-war financial system that made homeownership attainable for thousands and thousands of white, middle-class households, however that very same system additionally excluded others, notably communities of colour. Redlining, restrictive covenants, and discriminatory lending practices laid the inspiration for inequality lengthy earlier than Boomers ever entered the market.
In different phrases, many Boomers benefited from a system that was already tilted of their favor. They didn’t construct the system, however they actually reaped the rewards. And for lots of them, these rewards have been merely a product of timing, not malicious intent.
On the flip aspect, not all Boomers are sitting on paid-off properties and trip properties. Many are combating debt, downsizing out of necessity, or renting in retirement as a result of they have been priced out of the market, too. The generational blame sport solely tells a part of the story.

The Actual Villain: Coverage
If there’s one fixed throughout many years of housing issues, it’s coverage failure. Native governments have restricted housing growth via zoning legal guidelines that restrict density. Wealthier neighborhoods usually block inexpensive housing proposals to “protect character.” NIMBYism (Not In My Yard) is rampant, and older householders do are typically its loudest proponents.
However the subject isn’t generational. It’s structural. The dearth of housing provide, particularly inexpensive items, is a coverage selection. Hire management debates, tax incentives for builders, sluggish allow processes, and political opposition all play an element. Sure, Boomers vote in excessive numbers and infrequently help candidates who oppose housing reform. However pinning all of it on them ignores how complicated and entrenched the disaster actually is.
There are additionally broader financial forces at play—international traders shopping for up properties, tech booms inflating native markets, and wages that haven’t stored tempo with the price of residing. That’s not one thing one era can repair or break by itself.
Intergenerational Frustration Is Legitimate However Misplaced
It’s okay to really feel annoyed. To really feel like your dad and mom or their friends had it simpler. As a result of in some ways, they did. However frustration needs to be directed on the methods and constructions that made that ease attainable for some, and out of attain for others.
What we’d like isn’t extra blame. It’s extra solidarity. Extra consciousness of how insurance policies have failed a number of generations in several methods. Extra willingness to problem the established order, even when it advantages you. And sure, extra Boomers are advocating for modifications that make life higher for his or her kids and grandchildren, even when it means constructing extra duplexes of their quiet cul-de-sacs.
So…Are They to Blame?
Partially. Some Boomers completely helped create or keep the situations that led to right this moment’s disaster. Others are simply as caught on this mess as everybody else. Generational blame makes for straightforward headlines, nevertheless it not often results in actual options.
The housing disaster isn’t about Boomers vs. Millennials. It’s about affordability, fairness, and entry. And till we shift the dialog from blame to alter, the disaster goes to maintain getting worse for everybody.
Do you assume older generations have a accountability to repair the housing mess they benefited from? Or is the blame sport lacking the purpose?
Learn Extra:
Is it cheaper to renovate or purchase a brand new home?
Boomers Have Higher Cash Habits Than Most-What They Can Educate You