Opium of the Folks and Radical Chains

The historic mud has not settled, however at this second it appears clear {that a} proletariat which doesn’t embrace Marxism is totally attainable. Why not, then, Marxism and not using a proletariat? In a considerate article, “Radical Chains: The Marxian Idea of Proletarian Mission” (Research on the Left, September-October, 1966), Oscar Berland argues that this isn’t solely a thinkable but additionally a mandatory thought. Ronald Aronson’s “Reply” to Berland agrees that the proletariat has misplaced its revolutionary potential, however forcefully asserts that to scuttle the idea of proletarian mission is to scuttle Marx himself. The current paper typically sustains Berland, however places the argument in sharper phrases. On the identical time, and that is its main function, this paper makes an attempt to indicate that Marx’s mature financial theorizing (the core of which Berland rejects as “droll”) was under no circumstances centered across the idea of a “mission,” proletarian or in any other case, and that Marx’s formulation of the legal guidelines of capitalist improvement—sadly, for the proletarian trigger—might be proven to have been depressingly correct and sensible. Bringing to gentle a much-neglected side of Marx’s work, this paper hopes to stimulate curiosity in investigating the usefulness of the surplus-value idea for the understanding of contemporary capitalist class construction.

Martin Nicolaus’s  “Proletariat and Center Class in Marx: Hegelian Choreography and the Capitalist Dialectic” (Research on the Left, January-February, 1967) not solely put Oscar Berland’s argument in “sharper phrases,” it additionally employed Marx’s as but little identified and untranslated manuscripts from 1857-58, the Grundrisse, to take action. I’ve explored Nicolaus’s dialogue in that article of the Grundrisse in an earlier submit, Seeing the frowns on the jugglers and the clowns, so I will not elaborate on that side right here. 

What I’m primarily excited about right here is a few added hypothesis in Nicolaus’s subsequent “The Contradiction of Superior Capitalist Society and it Decision,” which condensed and popularized among the earlier article’s broader conclusions. It was initially offered at a seminar at Simon Fraser College in October of 1967 and was subsequently printed as a pamphlet by the SDS Radical Schooling Challenge. However first there’s a key level in Berland’s article that’s value reviewing.

Berland traces the “revolutionary mission of the proletariat” to Marx’s early essay, the “Introduction to a Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Proper.” (Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosopie, Einleitung). The essay contained a paragraph that has been imprecisely immortalized as “faith is the opiate of the plenty.” The complete sentiment is considerably extra sympathetic to faith’s optimistic contribution, whereas dropping none of its essential edge:

Non secular struggling is, at one and the identical time, the expression of actual struggling and a protest in opposition to actual struggling. Faith is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the guts [or “mind”] of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless circumstances. It’s the opium of the folks.

So it’s within the context of a continuation of Feuerbach’s critique of faith that the proletariat as the topic of revolution first appeared. Moreover, the proltetariat’s revolutionary position was offered within the particular context of the German folks’s political backwardness (Germany was not but a unitary state):

The place, then, is the optimistic chance of a German emancipation?

Reply: Within the formulation of a category with radical chains, a category of civil society which isn’t a category of civil society, an property which is the dissolution of all estates, a sphere which has a common character by its common struggling and claims no specific proper as a result of no specific fallacious, however fallacious typically, is perpetuated in opposition to it. … This dissolution of society as a specific property is the proletariat.

Berland described this passage because the younger Marx exalting in “the mere swish of his sword via the air,” taking the expression from Marx’s biographer, Franz Mehring. Nicolaus ignored the Berland/Mehring metaphor and employed his personal of “choreography,” which in any case shouldn’t be that dissimilar from sword swishing.

Three concerns should be reiterated concerning the particular context of Marx’s declaration. First, that it’s in response to what Marx noticed because the politically retarding affect of faith. Second, that it addressed the comparative semi-feudal backwardness of the Germans relative to England and France. And third, that the declaration occured years earlier than Marx had begun his research of political financial system. In fact, Marx himself shamelessly generalized from this anomolous specific and even advised work arounds for when the category with the novel chains declined to rattle them spontaneously, as Harold Rosenberg objected in “The Pathos of the Proletariat.”

In his “Contradiction of Superior Capitalist Society” pamphlet, Nicolaus omitted the textual criticism of early works by Marx, settling for the abstract that “Marx by no means succeeded utterly in welding his pamphleteering and his critical political financial evaluation into an natural, coherent complete.” Nicolas did not point out the Grundrisse in his pamphlet but it surely’s affect is clear if you recognize the place to look. For instance, he quoted the mature Marx, “Capital is its personal contradiction,” which is a tough translation of a passage from the Grundrisse.

What was new and intriguing in “The Contradiction” is Nicolaus’s tentative seek for another revolutionary topic in superior capitalist society:

Radical social concepts are radical not as a result of they categorical the demand for some imagined fascinating society, not as a result of they protest in opposition to some inequity within the current order. Their radicalness derives from their means to specific the repressed potential of the current social order, from their accuracy in pointing to the probabilities which the established order negates.

In a subsequent part titled “Employees or Hippies,” he expanded on the notion of expressing the repressed potential of the social order.

It’s past my function and my skills to current an ample abstract of the hippie subculture. Nonetheless, sure distinguishing options can, I feel, be described at this level. First, one should peel away a whole large layer of commercialism and faddism. Then one should work previous the drug challenge. On this regard, ‘straight’ society insists that using medicine is an escape from actuality, whereas spokesmen for the hippie subculture insist with equal firmness, although extra gently, that using medicine is a method of exploring actuality extra successfully. It could be that neither rationalization is legitimate. My very own casual observations lead me to assume that using medicine serves as little greater than an esoteric ceremony, a badge of identification to demarcate this subculture sharply from the bigger tradition and to advertise inner solidarity, very similar to the Semitic refusal to eat pork or the key handclasps of fraternal orders. As soon as previous the drug challenge, what stays of the hippie subculture might be summarized underneath two headings. First, the hippie refuses to work for a dwelling if in any respect attainable (although he may fit, sometimes in inventive types for pleasure and self-satisfaction). Second, the hippie tradition denies the significance of the connection between males and commodities, and asserts the primacy of direct relationships amongst human beings. These two ideas quantity to the assertion, so offensive to capitalist society and those that share its ethos, that there are extra vital issues in life than to earn one’s dwelling. Variously subsisting on the excess revenue of middle-class dad and mom, on the waste merchandise of the financial system, or on handouts from any supply accessible (not often are hippies in a position to obtain welfare funds), the hippie subculture asserts that the period of fabric shortage is or must be over, and declares that the time has come to abolish the compulsion exercised by financial relationships over real human relationships. A subculture inside the subculture, the ‘Diggers,’ has begun to prepare an embryonic financial subsystem based mostly on free distribution of mandatory items.

Looking back, Nicolaus’s description of the “hippie tradition” must be certified with the stipulation that the majority younger folks within the Nineteen Sixties with lengthy hair, readers of the choice press, customers of marijuana and LSD, and critics of the stereotypical Nineteen Fifties suburban way of life and work ethic had been not hippies. The had been solely designated hippies by the media and by passing yahoos in a automobile shouting, “get a job, hippie!”

Whereas doing the archival analysis for this essay, I got here throughout Candy Chaos, a guide concerning the Grateful Useless by Carol Brightman, who had been the writer and editor of Viet-Report within the Nineteen Sixties and helped launch its short-lived successor, Leviathan. Candy Chaos alternates between a story concerning the Useless, Deadheads, and Jerry Garcia on one hand and reflections on her personal political activism throughout the Nineteen Sixties. She was making an attempt to return to phrases with the endurance of the Greatful Useless phenomenon and the evaporation of the political radicalism of the Nineteen Sixties.