Learn the report in translation:
European air site visitors presents one of many continent’s largest obstacles to halting local weather breakdown and reaching the local weather targets subscribed to in worldwide and European legislation. Earlier than the Covid-19 pandemic, the sector’s affect was rising quickly. All indications recommend this development is now resuming. Extra local weather harm arising from the expansion in air site visitors has out-stripped modest reductions delivered by technological developments. A variety of professional our bodies has suggested that technological options and different fuels are restricted and a sole reliance on these is not going to be adequate to align the sector with internationally agreed local weather commitments. EU and nationwide authorities coverage up to now has been insufficient in contrast with the size of the problem and doesn’t assure emissions reductions on behalf of society.
Stronger coverage is required, however Europe has already begun to expertise the backlash which might develop if local weather motion doesn’t ship honest and really feel honest. If we’re to safe a speedy world transition to keep away from local weather breakdown, European policymakers will need to have a transparent view of two key dimensions of the unfairness of aviation’s local weather harm: first, the inequity between these nations liable for emissions (largely in Europe and North America) versus these experiencing essentially the most acute climate-driven loss and harm (largely within the World South); and second, the inequity inside nations between the minority who fly regularly (usually the wealthiest teams) and the bulk who fly hardly ever or by no means.
Globally, 1% of the world’s inhabitants produces 50% of aviation emissions, whereas roughly 80% have by no means set foot on a aircraft. Inside western Europe, our evaluation exhibits that the highest-income households (over £/€100,000 per 12 months) are not less than six occasions extra prone to take three or extra return flights per 12 months than these on the bottom incomes (underneath £/€20,000 per 12 months). In the meantime, among the many lowest-income group, nearly 70% of households don’t fly in any given 12 months, in contrast with simply over 20% among the many highest-income households.
Present coverage sees air site visitors exempted from most traditional types of taxation (eg gas responsibility and VAT). Not solely does this scale back state revenues, it signifies that the polluter doesn’t pay and leaves the business with inadequate incentive to chop emissions. Making use of a gas responsibility on kerosene, or one other type of complete carbon tax, on flights have to be an pressing precedence. In its absence, governments must also discover implementing significant distance surcharges on ticket taxes. Nonetheless, as the value impact of any such measures will create a a lot bigger relative barrier for these on low incomes in comparison with these on excessive incomes, we advocate supplementing gas tax and regulatory measures with a frequent flying levy (FFL). Certainly, we see an FFL as a key instrument for making certain the general public perceives local weather motion as honest and averting a backlash in opposition to politicians and the broader inexperienced transition.
Beneath an FFL a ticket tax is utilized to every single flight taken by a person. The tax charge rises incrementally after each two single flights taken (ie after each return flight). It may well help the inexperienced transition in three key methods:
- Assist to considerably reduce aviation emissions within the brief to medium time period, delivering the required financial savings that technological developments can not. Our examined coverage design, if carried out within the instance 12 months 2028, is calculated to have the ability to ship a 21% drop in European aviation carbon emissions.
- Defend entry to flying for rare, lower-income passengers whereas managing general air site visitors ranges and making polluters pay. The levy ends in no change to the taxes paid by 72% of the inhabitants in western Europe. Households incomes over £/€100,000 per 12 months are 4 occasions extra prone to pay the levy than households incomes underneath £/€20,000. As an alternative, the bulk (54%) of financial savings come from people who would in any other case have taken 4 or extra return flights per 12 months, a bunch representing simply 4.5% of the western European inhabitants.
- Increase important funds to be used in accelerating Europe’s transition to a fairer, greener economic system. These can recompense these nations least liable for the local weather disaster for damages skilled, and help staff and communities with jobs or native companies immediately in, or closely reliant on, air journey. Our examined coverage design raises €63.6bn in extra tax revenues throughout Europe.
On this report, we proof the effectiveness of the FFL coverage primarily based on evaluation grounded in an financial evaluation by CE Delft, utilizing the extensively recognised AERO MS mannequin, in addition to a New Economics Basis (NEF) evaluation of latest polling by Extra in Frequent. We additionally set out a possible roadmap to the implementation of such a coverage, demonstrating its feasibility and the way authorized obstacles could be overcome, grounded in a authorized evaluation by AdaStone Regulation. An FFL affords a good, possible, quick path to getting emissions for European aviation on monitor. The levy works finest if mixed with different coverage measures aimed toward chopping emissions, together with a kerosene/carbon tax on all flights departing European airports.