On the Columbia Middle for Up to date Important Thought Marx 9/13 session on the Grundrisse final night time, I requested a query from Zoom that can’t be heard on the Youtube video due to technical difficulties. I’ll attempt to reconstruct the jist of the query right here together with a little bit of context. I apologize if the reconstruction of my query is a little more coherent than the unique, which was made unintelligable by a time delay and obvious distractions within the viewers.
In his presentation, Michael Hardt spoke in regards to the Italian Autonomists’ “refusal of labor” technique that Antonio Negri articulated in his e book, Marx Past Marx. In speaking about how the technique associated to the Grundrisse, Hardt referred to a parenthetical passage the place Marx talked about “the employee’s participation within the increased, even cultural satisfactions…”:
…the agitation for his personal pursuits, newspaper subscriptions, attending lectures, educating his kids, growing his style and so on., his solely share of civilization which distinguishes him from the slave, is economically solely doable by widening the sphere of his pleasures on the occasions when enterprise is nice, the place saving is to a sure diploma doable.
Close to that refusal of labor and widening the sphere of enjoyment, I requested Hardt about Marx’s dialogue of disposable time and his exceptional sentence that “[t]he complete growth of wealth rests on the creation of disposable time.” I identified that Marx had cited the 1821 pamphlet, The Supply and Treatment of the Nationwide Difficulties, on disposable time instantly earlier than presenting his personal assertion and that William Godwin, who influenced the creator of the pamphlet (Dilke), wrote one thing similar to Marx’s widening the sphere of enjoyment:
These hours which aren’t required for the manufacturing of the necessaries of life, could also be dedicated to the cultivation of the understanding, the enlarging our inventory of data, the refining our style, and thus opening to us new and extra beautiful sources of enjoyment.
Given these affinities, I requested if Hardt had given any thought to how a studying of the 1821 pamphlet and of Godwin’s writings on leisure for all may illuminate Marx’s thought on these matters.
Here’s a clip of Michael Hardt’s reply: