SPOTIFY EMBED
ATM: Title
At The Cash: Jeff Hirsch on Presidential Investing Cycles. (January 25, 2025)
Is it higher to blurb or to not blurb? That’s the query? On this episode of On the Cash, I converse with Visitor.
Full transcript under.
~~~
About this week’s visitor:
Jeffrey Hirsch is editor of the Inventory Dealer’s Almanac & Almanac Investor Publication.
For more information, see:
~~~
Discover the entire earlier On the Cash episodes right here, and within the MiB feed on Apple Podcasts, YouTube, Spotify, and Bloomberg. And discover the complete musical playlist of On the Cash on Spotify
Beforehand:
On the Cash: Seasonality In Shares (December 21, 2023)
Hirsch’s WTF Forecast: Dow 38,820 (September 28, 2010)
Tremendous Growth: Why the Dow Jones Will Hit 38,820 and How You Can Revenue From It (April 12, 2011)
APPLE EMBED
Jeff Hirsch Presidential Cycles
New 12 months, new president, new insurance policies. What can we count on when a brand new president takes over the White Home? I’m Barry Ritholtz. And on at the moment’s version of At The Cash, we’re going to debate how presidential cycles have an effect on markets and equities.
To assist us perceive all of this and its implications on your portfolio, let’s herald Jeff Hirsch. He’s editor in chief of the Inventory Merchants Almanac since Might 2003. And in 2011, he was the creator of the ebook, “Superboom, Why the Dow Jones Will Hit 39,000 and How You Can Revenue From It.” Full disclosure, I wrote the foreword to that ebook.
So, so let’s leap proper into the presidential cycle idea. Your father, Yale Hirsch, developed this idea in 1967. Clarify his idea.
Jeff Hirsch: Yale actually put the presidential cycle, the four-year cycle, on Wall Road’s map when he revealed the primary almanac again in ’67. Backside line, it’s about presidents attempting to get re elected. They attempt to make voters completely satisfied, uh, prime the pump, um, within the third 12 months, um, we’ve acquired an entire web page on how the federal government manipulates the financial system, most not too long ago the 2023 inventory merchants almanac, they usually actually attempt to prop it up within the third 12 months, they usually handle their least savory coverage initiatives and agenda objects within the first two years, I believe what we’ve seen not too long ago with Trump 2.0 on day one, et cetera, is a living proof of that, attempting to get numerous stuff achieved. Overseas adversaries have a tendency to check new administrations early on. Ukraine in 22 is an efficient instance of that. And it form of creates this tendency for bear markets within the midterm 12 months. And that candy spot of the four-year cycle, the This fall of midterm 12 months to Q2, pre-election 12 months, and for those who bear in mind, October 22 is just about a textbook, midterm, traditional October backside.
Barry Ritholtz: 1967 looks like a very long time, totally different financial system, totally different market, totally different credit score cycle. How has the idea developed since, let’s name it 57 years in the past?
Jeff Hirsch: The primary years have been notoriously weak. I believe the largest change has been post-election years, which is what we’re in proper now at 25, have gotten significantly better.
It appears to be form of the identical priming of the pump forward of the midterm cycle now, the place they’re attempting to, um, hold on to as many congressional seats as potential. Publish-election years have improved dramatically since World Struggle II and extra dramatically since 1985, with the Dow averaging 17.2% in post-election years, 8 up, 2 down. Finest common acquire of the four-year cycle, besting the pre-election 12 months, which you realize Is the perfect over the long run at 15.2%, however the pre election 12 months solely has one loss Uh, regardless that the typical is a bit bit decrease. So Uh, it’s fairly bullish for 2025 for me, you realize, I’m, I’m taking a look at a, uh, uh, an up 12 months, 8 to 12 % is my base case with some pullbacks in Q1 and Q2, however you realize, not the 20 plus % we’ve had the previous couple of years.
Barry Ritholtz: I believe again, uh, since this idea got here out in 67, Nixon, Ford ever so briefly, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton for 2 phrases, Bush two for 2 phrases, Obama for 2 phrases, Trump, Biden, after which Trump once more. How has the presidential cycle idea held up over all these totally different presidents?
Jeff Hirsch: Fairly good on the whole. Apart from the nineties, you realize, the, dot com increase, just about straight up through the late nineties. However there’ve been some derailments. Loads of that is on web page 130 of your useful Inventory Merchants Alamanac. I’m going to behave the entire four-year cycle, which I at all times maintain in my desk. You may seek advice from it your self.
There’s been some derailments, it’s not excellent. We had the tremendous increase within the 90s into 2000. COVID was that form of large oversold — purchase there. Was it nonetheless a superb 12 months? The final cycle, which I simply, you realize, reset for subscribers 2021 to 24 was fairly textbook. You realize, not excellent, but it surely works pretty-damn effectively over the lengthy haul.
Barry Ritholtz: Let’s speak concerning the strongest 12 months. Tends to be the third 12 months of presidential phrases. Traditionally, they kick out all of the stops. All the pieces they may do in 12 months three, tease them up for the election 12 months. No matter whether or not it’s them operating for re election. or their get together, they, they actually are inclined to ship this larger.
And as you talked about in 2024, plus 25 % is a monster 12 months. Maintain apart how the incumbent get together loses with the financial system up as a lot because it was within the inventory market up that a lot. However what are the components that drive this sample? It’s been essentially the most constant a part of the, the cycle. The third 12 months nearly at all times appears to do rather well.
Jeff Hirsch: I acquired to repeat what we simply mentioned. I imply, it’s, it’s prime of the pump. It’s how the federal government manipulates the financial system to remain in energy. There’s, there’s an entire record of things with altering social safety funds. I imply even in New York state, you’re a New York State resident. You bought a test from from Gov Kathy Hochul simply forward of the election. I imply, it’s, it’s right down to the governor’s stage. It’s they’re not even attempting to cover it anymore.
It’s simply, you realize, they’re doing every thing they’ll to to safe their legacy to retain energy for themselves, their get together to make voters completely satisfied going into the sales space. And that’s what creates that. They acquired to do it forward of time as a result of they’re going to be campaigning within the election 12 months. In order that they acquired to do numerous this stuff to prime that pump within the pre-election 12 months. And that’s essentially the most constant. A part of it. It actually units up that candy spot that we speak about.
Barry Ritholtz: Plus it does take a short while for issues like fiscal spending and tax cuts to make its means via the financial system.
If the third 12 months is the strongest. What’s traditionally the weakest 12 months and, and what are the components that, that maintain that again?
Jeff Hirsch: It’s the midterm 12 months. The second 12 months. (We name it submit, mid, and pre. That’s Yale’s, Yale’s outdated nomenclature).
We had been throughout this in 2022. Putin invading Ukraine helped. I believe a part of the rationale that he went in was due to the timing of the cycle the place he is aware of and different overseas adversaries know that there’s a vulnerability therein America, but it surely’s the midterm 12 months and which you could see it on our charts. We do the 4 12 months cycle, breakdown by quarters.
The weak spot is Q2 and Q3 of the midterm 12 months. Dow’s down on common 2%, S&P 2.5%, NASDAQ minus 6.6%, and that units up that candy spot.
Barry Ritholtz: Any distinction within the historic knowledge between, let’s say a president has two phrases between the four-year cycle of time period one and the four-year cycle of time period two or does it not matter?
Jeff Hirsch: It’s a bit bit higher. Not, not a lot. In time period two.
Barry Ritholtz: The idea being, hey, if the financial system is sweet sufficient for them to get reelected.
Jeff Hirsch: Particularly in that submit election 12 months, the fifth 12 months of a presidency, um, you realize, they’ve acquired extra of a mandate. Uh, you realize, we’ve seen, you realize, on common about 9.7% for the S&P in these fifth years versus what it’s about all years about 9.5% of the all submit lectures, a bit bit decrease than that. Nevertheless it’s been rather a lot higher in current historical past. You realize, you return to, you realize, 1917, 1937, ‘57, ‘73, all weak years. In that fifth 12 months, um, however since, since 85, you realize, submit election years, fifth years are nice.
Barry Ritholtz: Right here’s a completely random query, and I do know there’s no actual good reply to this. Does it matter if the presidential phrases are non-consecutive? I do know we now have now an information set of 1 earlier than this.
Jeff Hirsch: Perhaps, perhaps one. I imply, 1893, we had the panic in 1893. The despair from 1883 to 1997, we had what? Was there even indoor plumbing in every single place again then?
I don’t suppose so. Not precisely the identical market. No, not precisely the identical world. (from Fiddler, it’s a brand new world, Golda) It’s a lot totally different, um, but it surely’s nonetheless all about, constructing their legacy, protecting the get together in energy, and, um, a bit little bit of ego concerned there, however, uh, it’s attempting to make issues look as nice as potential for his or her get together and their, and their legacy.
Barry Ritholtz: So It’s humorous we’re speaking about 1893. It seems like America at the moment is extra partisan and extra polarized than it’s been actually in our lifetimes. Does which have any influence on the presidential cycle?
Jeff Hirsch: I don’t suppose so. I’m unsure if it’s if it’s notion. Um, you realize, we all know one another a very long time. We all know numerous the identical individuals within the enterprise. I’ve numerous buddies from totally different factors of view. There’s individuals within the enterprise totally different factors of view. However after we speak about issues, there’s much more in widespread than totally different, even with the individuals on totally different ideologies and totally different political factors of view.
If something, I believe it would amplify the 4 12 months cycle as a result of it’s extra incumbent upon the incumbents (pardon the alliteration there) to retain energy and to attempt to maintain their get together in Congress. And I believe it may actually amplify it.
Barry Ritholtz: So that you’re an information wonk, you’ve been going via the Inventory Merchants Almanac on your complete profession. You’re at all times taking a look at all these fascinating numbers and, and market knowledge. What’s been the largest shock or anomaly you’ve noticed in presidential market cycles?
Jeff Hirsch: To begin with, I grew up doing this. I imply, I took over the editorship in 03, however, I grew up operating these numbers by hand and out of Barron’s with a bit ruler and a pink pen and, you realize, an including machine and graph paper with a, with a, with a pencil.
The most important shock I believe is the report of the Dow in pre-election years of no losses since 1939 till 2015. So from 1943 to 2023 in, in submit election years, excuse me. Pre election years, the Dow is 20 and 1.
After which the opposite factor, with the 4 12 months cycle, there’s a pair different discoveries and issues we made, however for the 4 12 months cycle, this factor I discussed earlier was the post-election 12 months flipping from being the worst, you realize, within the large historical past at the back of the Almanac, like I discussed, to being the perfect since 85.
Barry Ritholtz: Why do you suppose that’s the first 12 months droop simply hasn’t materialized since actually, because the monetary disaster? Are we blaming accrediting low rates of interest within the fed for this? Or is it one thing else?
Jeff Hirsch: I believe it has one thing to do with the compressor of the cycle that I’ve talked about the place midterms have turn out to be rather more vital to hold on to the slim margins we’ve seen in recent times.
And also you form of have that just about, you realize, second pre-election 12 months. It’s the post-election 12 months of the primary 12 months of the time period is, is absolutely the, the pre midterm election 12 months the place they acquired to do stuff. Uh, to, to make the voters completely satisfied, um, in order that they’ll maintain their get together in Congress as effectively, or win again some seats, no matter it would, could be on the time.
Barry Ritholtz: So our closing query, how ought to buyers take into consideration their funding postures relative to presidential cycles?
Jeff Hirsch: Properly, you realize, we now have a technique the place we use the, the seasonality, the perfect and worst months together with the 4 12 months cycle. We mainly keep in from the midterm low. You realize, the midterm purchase sign October via the post-election 12 months, April, Might.
So mainly, you wish to keep away from the weak spots. Q1 submit election 12 months, Q1 first 12 months is likely one of the weak spots. Not fairly as dangerous, however the actual one I discussed earlier than, Q2 and Q3, the midterm 12 months. And also you wish to again up the truck for the candy spot for that, you realize, October purchase within the midterm 12 months like we had within the traditional one we had in 2022.
And I believe you wish to. You realize, be leery of getting out and in at occasions when the cycle is troughing or peaking, identical to you’ll do with the seasonal cycle. So mainly, you wish to be lengthy This fall midterm 12 months via the post-election 12 months first quarter and form of be extra cautious in these two years.
Barry Ritholtz: So to wrap up, buyers with a long-term perspective ought to put together themselves for a bit little bit of softening following the primary quarter of a brand new presidential time period – perhaps it lasts 4 quarters, 6 quarters. Traditionally, it’s a bit weaker than the remainder of the cycle. When it makes that low, whether or not that’s the summer season or October of the midterm 12 months, That’s what tees you up for actually the perfect historic returns inside a brand new presidency.
So strap your self in, may get a bit shaky for the subsequent couple of quarters, however the payoff for that’s from the midterm cycle via the final 12 months of the presidency.
~~~
Discover our total music playlist for On the Cash on Spotify.
