Labour unions have lengthy formed the financial and political panorama of superior economies. All through the Twentieth century, they decreased inequality (Farber et al. 2021, Osorio-Buitron and Jaumotte 2015), improved working situations (Rosenfeld 2019, Bryson et al. 2020), and influenced insurance policies (Ahlquist 2017) and political techniques (Acemoglu and Robinson 2013, Ogeda et al. 2024).
Regardless of fluctuations in membership, unions stay pivotal in in the present day’s economic system (OECD 2019). Within the US, union approval charges lately reached 70% (Gallup n.d.) – one of many highest ranges in 90 years – and the variety of employees concerned in work stoppages surged by 141% in 2023 (from 224,000 to 539,000) (Ritchie et al. 2023). In different elements of the world, equivalent to Europe, the place collective bargaining has a powerful custom, organised labour continues to broaden into beforehand unorganised sectors and affect labour market situations.
But, regardless of their enduring significance, the empirical proof on the forces behind unions’ emergence and development stays restricted. In a latest paper (Medici 2024), I look at how mass immigration from Europe to the US throughout the early Twentieth century formed the rise of American labour unions.
How immigration impacts unions is ambiguous. On one hand, elevated job competitors can inspire employees to unionise to defend wages and employment. However, a bigger labour provide might make it simpler for employers to interchange uncooperative or hanging employees, weakening unions’ bargaining energy. Whether or not immigration fosters or hinders unionisation is in the end an empirical query.
The early Twentieth-century US affords a compelling setting to look at this query. The US was already the world’s largest economic system (Bolt and Van Zanden 2020), and the labour motion started increasing nationally (Foner 1947). Many unions based throughout this era stay influential in the present day. This development occurred regardless of important challenges to organising, as employers might legally dismiss or exchange unionising and hanging employees with out going through penalties (Taft 1964). Immigration performed a central position in shaping these dynamics. Between 1850 and 1920, round 30 million European immigrants entered the US, reworking native labour markets and creating each alternatives and challenges for organised labour (Determine 1).
Determine 1 Variety of union members and influx of immigrants to the US, Eighteen Eighties to 1920
Notes: Panel A reveals the full variety of union members within the US between 1880 and 1920 (Freeman 1998). Panel B reveals the influx of immigrants to the US between 1850 and 1920 (Immigration Coverage Institute).
Learning the connection between immigration and unions presents two key challenges: measuring native unionisation and establishing causal results. To measure unionisation, I digitised archival paperwork on unions affiliated with the American Federation of Labour between 1900 and 1920 – a interval when American Federation of Labour unions represented over 80% of union members nationwide. These data, drawn from the conference proceedings of state federations of labour, present detailed data on the quantity and site of union branches throughout the nation, and permit me to assemble novel estimates of union membership. These information present the primary complete, local-level measurements of historic union presence and density within the US (Determine 2).
To estimate the causal influence of immigration, I employed a shift-share instrumental variable strategy (Card 2001). This methodology leverages chain migration patterns, whereby immigrants are inclined to settle in areas with established communities from their international locations of origin.
Determine 2 County-level union density
Notes: These maps show county-level union density (i.e. the variety of union members as a fraction of the labour drive) in 1900, 1910, and 1920. The legend represents the deciles of the distribution in 1920.
Supply: Creator’s calculations from conference proceedings of the state federations of labour (American Federation of Labour unions).
Most important Outcomes
The outcomes present that immigration fostered the emergence of organised labour. Counties that acquired extra immigrants as a share of the inhabitants skilled will increase in union presence, the variety of union branches, the share of unionised employees, and the variety of union members per department.
Immigration spurred unionisation each on the intensive and intensive margins – increasing unions in counties with an current labour motion and establishing new unions elsewhere. For each 100 immigrants coming into the typical county, union membership elevated by almost 20 employees. A back-of-the-envelope calculation means that with out immigration, common union density (i.e. the share of unionised employees) would have been roughly 22% decrease between 1900 and 1920.
Mechanisms
Why did immigration promote unionisation? The proof is according to current employees unionising in response to immigration for financial in addition to social motivations.
Immigration affected unions in expert and unskilled occupations otherwise: it spurred unionisation amongst expert employees however had smaller and statistically insignificant results for unskilled ones (Determine 3). Expert employees, equivalent to these in craft occupations, organised to guard their jobs and wages. Their specialised abilities acted as limitations to entry, making them not instantly replaceable and enabling them to type or be part of unions. This allowed them to exclude new employees from their occupations and stop outsiders from buying the abilities required for these jobs. In distinction, low-skilled employees, equivalent to labourers, struggled to maintain unions. Their jobs might be simply and instantly stuffed by newcomers, which decreased their bargaining energy and made unionisation efforts in response to immigration largely unsuccessful.
Determine 3 Immigration and unionisation amongst expert vs unskilled employees
Notes: This determine reveals the coefficients and confidence intervals from two-stage least squares regressions analyzing the results of immigration on unionisation. The blue bar on the left shows the impact on all employees, whereas the gray bars on the best present the results on expert and unskilled employees individually.
Alongside financial motivations, the outcomes additionally help the position of social elements within the enlargement of labour unions. American Federation of Labour unions usually adopted nativist rhetoric, portraying immigrants – notably these from Southern and Japanese Europe – as culturally distant and fewer prone to assimilate or unionise successfully. These attitudes had been mirrored in unionisation patterns. Unionisation grew extra prominently in counties that acquired immigrants from culturally distant areas (Determine 4). It additionally expanded extra in areas that probably displayed stronger anti-immigrant sentiment, equivalent to these with robust historic help for nativist actions just like the Know Nothing social gathering or greater ranges of residential segregation between immigrants and US-born residents (Determine 5).
Determine 4 Supply areas of European immigrants and unionisation
Notes: This determine reveals the coefficients and confidence intervals from two-stage least squares regressions analyzing the results of immigration on unionisation. The blue bar on the left shows the impact of immigrants from any European nation, whereas the gray bars on the best present the results of immigration from Southern and Japanese Europe or Northern and Western Europe individually.
Determine 5 Native anti-immigrant sentiment and unionisation
Notes: This determine reveals the coefficients and confidence intervals from two-stage least squares regressions analyzing the results of immigration on unionisation. The blue bars on the left show the results for counties with high and low historic vote shares of the Know Nothing social gathering. The gray bars on the best present the results for counties with high and low baseline ranges of residential segregation between US-born people and European immigrants.
You will need to notice that these outcomes are additionally according to financial explanations. Immigrants from Southern and Japanese Europe probably had decrease wage expectations than these from Northern and Western Europe, making them extra prone to be perceived as a risk to current employees’ situations. Furthermore, fears of financial competitors from immigrants might have amplified damaging stereotypes and bolstered pre-existing resentment. General, the outcomes help the position of each financial and social elements in driving the noticed development of organised labour.
Various explanations, equivalent to immigrants disproportionately becoming a member of unions or bringing radical ideologies from their dwelling international locations, are usually not supported by the information. The outcomes are additionally not pushed by different main occasions throughout this era, such because the political and financial transformations attributable to World Conflict I and the First Pink Scare, or by differential financial development skilled by counties receiving bigger shares of immigrants.
Lengthy-Time period Implications
The results of early Twentieth-century immigration on unionisation prolong properly past the historic interval studied. Locations that acquired extra immigrants between 1890 and 1920 proceed to exhibit greater union density in the present day, suggesting that early unionisation created sturdy institutional benefits for organised labour.
Immigration additionally reshaped occupational selections. US-born employees more and more took unionised jobs, probably utilizing organised labour as safety towards immigrant competitors.
Conclusion
This analysis identifies immigration as a key driver of unionisation throughout the childhood of the American labour motion. By analyzing how immigration formed organised labour, the examine highlights the financial and social forces that affect labour market establishments.
These findings additionally broaden our understanding of the implications of immigration, displaying that responses to giant immigrant inflows are usually not restricted to elevated help for conservative events or anti-immigration insurance policies. As a substitute, immigration can foster the expansion of organisations, equivalent to unions, with broad financial and political impacts.
Whereas the historic context is exclusive, the outcomes level to broader mechanisms that stay related in the present day. Renewed curiosity in unions might replicate employees’ responses to fashionable labour market pressures – equivalent to immigration, globalisation, and technological change. These dynamics are usually not confined to the US. Additionally they resonate with superior economies going through comparable challenges and with industrialising nations present process financial transformations akin to early Twentieth-century America.
Additional analysis is required to look at how organised labour responds to financial shocks in numerous contexts. The dataset assembled for this examine gives new alternatives to research many further questions, such because the long-term influence of early unionisation on immigrant integration and its broader influence on the US economic system and political panorama.
See unique submit for references
